Morality video compilations | Business-Management Videos

Animaniacs - Wheel of Morality Compilation
Posted by: cocoacoconuts75

Video duration: 158 seconds
Global video hits: 389037

Just a little something I thought I'd try out. =) The Deluxe Wheel of Morality - a package big enough to rival anything they sell at Costco! Enjoy!
P.S Animaniacs Vol. 3 will be released on June 19, 2007!! Good Golly Miss Molly, the Warners are coming, the Warners are coming!

Related: animaniacs, morality, of, wheel

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

Disney was so owned ...
By: Kathrynmovies. on 08 Jan 09, 02:05:33
Disney was so owned!!! By that =D

Love the disney ...
By: FallEnova. on 08 Jan 09, 01:04:52
Love the disney channel part- lol all the way

to make the fox ...
By: S0up3rD0up3r. on 08 Jan 09, 01:00:59
to make the fox censors cry? WIN!!!!

To Make fun of the ...
By: LilSpawn. on 06 Jan 09, 17:58:08
To Make fun of the Disney Channel?? LMAOO

1:54
By: BamfingBob. on 05 Jan 09, 21:00:46
1:54

shoot -_- meh I ...
By: invaderRina. on 03 Jan 09, 23:49:26
shoot -_- meh I ALWAYS think I'm helping people then I run into smart people like you to correct me! thanks :)

:47
By: oxsevenxo. on 03 Jan 09, 23:16:45
:47

I would like to buy ...
By: FrownfaceProductions. on 03 Jan 09, 22:30:39
I would like to buy a vowel!

This was great! You ...
By: bobdole9696. on 03 Jan 09, 01:57:26
This was great! You should do one with the intro and compile the different endings.

"to make fun of ...
By: ssbb2007. on 02 Jan 09, 08:41:44
"to make fun of Disney channel" lol! :D

i always thought ...
By: MyRealNameIsJeff. on 02 Jan 09, 01:14:27
i always thought wakko sounded more like ringo starr

John Lennon. He was ...
By: UnderlordZ. on 01 Jan 09, 19:34:48
John Lennon. He was doing his John Lennon voice. And yes, Lennon was one of The Beatles.

so true
By: KDavisJr86. on 01 Jan 09, 02:49:49
so true

2:24
By: DJKahuna. on 31 Dec 08, 05:00:15
2:24

"But you can't ...
By: soulsiege. on 30 Dec 08, 05:55:29
"But you can't teach Madonna to act" LOL!

Great job!!!
By: michelle0318. on 30 Dec 08, 03:35:33
Great job!!!

classic, had me in ...
By: silverboi2007. on 28 Dec 08, 20:55:26
classic, had me in stitches

"To waste your ...
By: kaxx000. on 28 Dec 08, 07:15:24
"To waste your lives?" LOL!!

uhhh yeah I think ...
By: invaderRina. on 26 Dec 08, 07:04:11
uhhh yeah I think so...when they interviewed the voice actors jess harnell (voice of wakko) talked about his audition for the show and he wanted to try imitating a beatle or somethin' then when he saw a pic of wakko he just made the voice sound smaller to fit a 7 yr old.....somewhat like that

uhhh yeah I think ...
By: invaderRina. on 26 Dec 08, 07:04:02
uhhh yeah I think so...when they interviewed the voice actors jess harnell (voice of wakko) talked about his audition for the show and he wanted to try imitating a beatle or somethin' then when he saw a pic of wakko he just made the voice sound smaller to fit a 7 yr old.....somewhat like that

the show's so ...
By: XxImprisonedAngelxX. on 26 Dec 08, 00:02:45
the show's so completely random they WOULD HAVE to have to wheel of morality XD BUT OMG i remember the animanics i loved that show as a kid

hahah "to look for ...
By: obsesivewithkh2. on 25 Dec 08, 07:31:52
hahah "to look for elvis at 7-11" This show was epic

"To make the Fox ...
By: TheRealCodeBlack. on 25 Dec 08, 06:58:34
"To make the Fox Censor's cry?" That had me cracking up.

if at first you ...
By: bigdonniekool1. on 25 Dec 08, 06:18:10
if at first you dont succeed...... balme your parents

u cant teach and ...
By: ScaryCreepyMonster87. on 23 Dec 08, 13:52:34
u cant teach and old dog new tricks,(but u can teach moddonna to act)

Catholic morality
Posted by: patcondell

Video duration: 254 seconds
Global video hits: 127481

A contradiction in terms?
http://www.guardi an.co.uk/world/2003/ aug/17/religion.chil dprotection
You can download an audio version of this video at http://patcondell.li bsyn.com/

Related: atheism, atheist, catholic, morality, nazi, religion

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

i-meen,i dont like ...
By: operawithapickle. on 08 Jan 09, 22:42:00
i-meen,i dont like the whole was jesus gay things like that..but i dont like people talking about things like that either be it about Buddha or the queen.its difficult to understand the true side of christianity..i think you see things in a diffrent light..a bright sparkly light with angel wings and women handing out cupcakes in sunday school..its all about seek,capture,control..god is the pefect master passion greed and if you have a weak mind,He''ll be knocking on your door!!

Im not changing my ...
By: Zeliziouz. on 08 Jan 09, 22:35:57
Im not changing my mind about anything. I have my own view about this.. When I responded to you I was still affected on a previous Pat video I watched,I didnt like everything he said there..I agree a lot on what pat says, but there are some things I disagree.. Ya-meen..

you change your ...
By: operawithapickle. on 08 Jan 09, 22:27:45
you change your mind about things so easily tho..you switch depending on what someone says..there is truth then there is not the truth..you cant have an in between..you cant be like o i think like an atheist but believe there is a god cause thats just a contradiction.when it comes to religon there is no in between..im not saying all religous people are nut cakes and you cant take a joke btw!

What??? I am not! ...
By: Zeliziouz. on 08 Jan 09, 22:21:08
What??? I am not! Gosh why should there be only one way to think? That you should either hate everything about religion and think that all the religious people are child molesters, or nuts etc, or you should be a religious fanatic? Life is not black and white..

you are so turning ...
By: operawithapickle. on 08 Jan 09, 21:46:56
you are so turning into a christian..o it hurts me to see :)

haha oh the brutal ...
By: XxsoulsuckerxX. on 08 Jan 09, 18:52:52
haha oh the brutal honest truth brings a smile to my face. catholocism = hypocrisy

brilliant. ...
By: tapesquare. on 08 Jan 09, 18:06:05
brilliant. absolutely brilliant. well said mr. condell.

There are no such ...
By: Llokky. on 08 Jan 09, 15:56:18
There are no such things as: jesus=god, god(whatever name he is given), saints, ghosts, Toothfairy, devils, etc. Its just Mother Nature, just that!

Good point Spaz. I ...
By: Zeliziouz. on 08 Jan 09, 09:56:30
Good point Spaz. I guess violence is within us, and we are using religion or what ever as an exuce..

So the birth of ...
By: ravenshmash. on 08 Jan 09, 02:56:56
So the birth of Christ caused all of the misery and bloodshed in the world over the the past two thousand years? I see... Because there certainly wasn't any of that stuff during the 4.5 billion years before he was born.

haha is that why ...
By: operawithapickle. on 08 Jan 09, 01:07:09
haha is that why you are commenting on his video? cause you dont give a shit..if you didnt give a shit you wouldnt be watchin..What pat says is truth,whole truth and nothing but the truth..if you dont like it there are billons of other videos on youtube for you to watch..ones that dont include people speaking there minds!! Truth hurts..right?

Wow!! This is bad.. ...
By: Zeliziouz. on 08 Jan 09, 00:58:53
Wow!! This is bad..but so true..

Holocaust is a myth.
By: WhiteNationalistCA. on 07 Jan 09, 12:22:28
Holocaust is a myth.

Nazis were good ...
By: WhiteNationalistCA. on 07 Jan 09, 12:21:56
Nazis were good people.

I critized the ...
By: mdcorreia. on 06 Jan 09, 04:51:18
I critized the present worst religion I see as the muslim - about 1400 years out of date. The Catholic religion foundamentally came a long way from the dark ages. Howwever PatCondell hits the nail right on the head on all topics so far including about all mambo jumbo which religions are about! Basically we need LAWS but not GODS?

a common jew.
By: DIANNA80. on 06 Jan 09, 02:47:54
a common jew.

This video is right ...
By: jwgirl81. on 05 Jan 09, 20:56:43
This video is right on. Even if you don't believe in Jesus as the son of God or anything like that you can appreciate his teachings. He said why do you say to your brother here let me help you take this speck of dust out of your eye. Hypocrite! First you must remove the plank from your own eye to be able to see clearly enough to help your brother remove the dust from his eye. A lot like what Pat said at the end of this video.

LOL. Pat is awesome!
By: scott5306. on 05 Jan 09, 15:32:20
LOL. Pat is awesome!

Since you keep ...
By: YulieAna. on 05 Jan 09, 03:45:19
Since you keep posting on his videos apparently you do along with other 65K subscribers. "He feels inferior and most likely is a gay or a paedophile" Yet you keep coming for more.....don't project your fantasies on everyone else.

Oi!! Pat don't pull ...
By: vornavalley. on 04 Jan 09, 13:20:04
Oi!! Pat don't pull no punches ne. I have to agree with him though - I have allways likened the catholics to nazis - both butnt books, committed genocide, brainwashed, deceived ...

In World War 2
By: eknemp. on 04 Jan 09, 03:49:55
In World War 2

does this guy ...
By: crucialraz. on 04 Jan 09, 02:38:37
does this guy really believe that people {jews christians muslims etc] really give a shit what he thinks. hes got nothin better to do but to criticise others.He feels inferior and most likely is a gay or a paedophile

Anyone can respond ...
By: humansymbiote. on 03 Jan 09, 16:07:21
Anyone can respond criticizing me of doing no research, yet do no research himself, while acting supreme. Hypocrisy personified.

And anyone with a ...
By: Singebuggercat. on 03 Jan 09, 04:38:31
And anyone with a keyboard and no brain can fail to do any research, ask a snide rhetorical question from a position of total ignorance, and get laughed at. Isn't the internet wonderful. :D

were you beaten as ...
By: poptarts47. on 02 Jan 09, 11:30:35
were you beaten as achild you geriatric liver spotted fuck

Sam Harris - Stem Cells and Morality
Posted by: BlissfulKnowledge

Video duration: 234 seconds
Global video hits: 66640

A section from Sam Harris' talk at the Beyond Belief 2 conference. Harris argues that religion obscures moral intuitions, using the case of stem cells.
Check out The Science Network at http://thesciencenet work.org/

Related: atheism, bible, cells, harris, morality, politics, religion, sam, science, stem, theology

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

YES! SIR! This is ...
By: soulisland. on 06 Jan 09, 20:07:54
YES! SIR! This is why I do not believe in god. I know I under stand that there is some thing there. But the way you guys think of it (religious people) I do not because It doesn't add up. You are harming people with your beliefs.

Also there were ...
By: xXAkridXx. on 05 Jan 09, 08:08:20
Also there were probably a lot of closest atheist. Because the word "atheist" used to be derogatory. Most non-believers just stayed quiet or played along out of fear of persecution.

Ben Stiller!
By: mooktank. on 04 Jan 09, 23:40:35
Ben Stiller!

The fact that you ...
By: dydx62x. on 04 Jan 09, 23:40:20
The fact that you claim to have not the the advocation of murder, or the oppression of women proves you have not read the bible. Here is a few to get you started. 2 Chronicles 15:12-13,Exodus 21:15,Deuteronomy 13:13-19,Isaiah 14:21. There are many more examples available, just do what you claim others haven't.

"The Church's ...
By: sephjazz. on 01 Jan 09, 09:18:28
"The Church's position on abortion takes no more notice of the details of biology than it does of the reality of human suffering. It has been estimated that 50% of all human conceptions end in spontaneous abortion, usually without a woman even realizing that she was pregnant. In fact, 20% of all recognized pregnancies end in miscarriage. There is an obvious truth here that cries out for acknowledgment: if God exists, He is the most prolific abortionist of all." - Sam Harris

is that Ben Stiller?
By: TheChristianDefender. on 27 Dec 08, 09:02:04
is that Ben Stiller?

"I C no suppression ...
By: xXAkridXx. on 26 Dec 08, 08:16:47
"I C no suppression of women or any1 murdering any1" Read the Bible for fuck's sake! Your comment proves you haven't.

Oh I think he can ...
By: bossman1005. on 20 Dec 08, 04:42:19
Oh I think he can be that stupid....

FreedomLover4Ever ...
By: pmacgilli. on 19 Dec 08, 07:06:54
FreedomLover4Ever Nature, not God? Your god's design has been killing children either in childbirth or very soon after for hundreds of thousands of years. Even in the time of Jesus infant mortality was so high it was a slim majority that survived past 1 year old. Sorry to say but if your god created this mess he's responsible. He's killed far more children than abortion simply by being a shitty planner. Either you're insane or just being an asshole. You can't really be this stupid.

my personal ...
By: Byrnie1989. on 16 Dec 08, 18:09:08
my personal favourite biblical quote: Exodus 2:11-12 "One day, after Moses had grown up, he went out to where his own people were... He saw an egyption beating a hebrew, one of his own people. Glancing this way and that and seeing no one, he killed the egyption and hid him in the sand."

"And a man will ...
By: Byrnie1989. on 16 Dec 08, 18:04:57
"And a man will choose...any wickedness, but the wickedness of a woman...Sin began with a woman and thanks to her we all must die" Ecclesiasticus, 25:18, 19 & 33. 1 "And I find more bitter than death the woman, whose heart is snares and nets, and her hands as bands: whoso pleaseth God shall escape from her; but the sinner shall be taken by her." Ecclesiastes 7:26, and how would you interpret these?

LOL! UR making up ...
By: FreedomLover4Ever. on 15 Dec 08, 23:18:37
LOL! UR making up UR own Bible & everything else. This is not the way Christians interpret the Bible. Jesus said "all" R 2 B free. I C no suppression of women or any1 murdering any1. There were 3 or 4 founding fathers who were deists & the rest of the 50-some signers were Christians, altho almost all went 2 church every Sunday AT THE WHITEHOUSE. Google "founding fathers religions." There's a gov site which states each founders religion. Do atheists have 2 lie?

The bible promotes ...
By: Byrnie1989. on 15 Dec 08, 16:02:27
The bible promotes Slavery The bible promotes the suppression of women The bible promotes murdering members of another theological group. The 'founding fathers' were secularists and the majority were Deists. Hiter may not have been a christian by ideology, but he said numerous times he was. Stalin's communist Russia was a State based on the worship of the leader, as was Pol Piots.. they created a Quasi-religious state similar to North Korea today.

what terrorist ...
By: fifabreaker. on 14 Dec 08, 11:34:55
what terrorist attack are atheist responsible for? thats an exceptional claim! have we any evidence? actually washington was a deist, franklin too jefferson a deist, antitheist. lincoln totally atheist. yeeeeeaaaaahhhhhh?

Go die in a fire ...
By: BernerG. on 14 Dec 08, 02:37:11
Go die in a fire you ignorant twat.

I agree that Islam ...
By: FreedomLover4Ever. on 13 Dec 08, 18:05:17
I agree that Islam is a dangerous religion. Resurrecting pol piot, etc, is about like resurrecting Christianity's past, even tho the crusades were after Muslims had attacked/taken Jerusalem, Egypt, Italy, Constantinople, Spain, France & Rome. But it was our Christians ancestors who fought 4 & died 4 the freedoms we enjoy today, NOT ATHEISTS. Find a list of terrorist attacks N the world & U will C atheist groups R only 2nd 2 Muslim terrorists, not 2 mention their hatemongering N the world today

The most vicious ...
By: kennebacasiskyle. on 13 Dec 08, 13:11:37
The most vicious group in the world today? Are you serious? You are truly delusional. The next time you hear about a group of non-believers stoning anyone, or burning them, or hanging them, or torturing them, you let me know. And don't bother to resurrect Pol Piot and Stalin and Hitler, that argument has been done away with already, and at best just leads to mud-slinging over the crusades or a pointless debate about who "really" believed something. Heaven and hell are DANGEROUS lies.

Many think not ...
By: FreedomLover4Ever. on 13 Dec 08, 12:37:17
Many think not having a choice of heaven or hell is much more 2 fear & much more cruel. Atheists R control freaks. They R turning atheism N2 a religion & they R the biggest prostelyzers N the world today. Many ppl disagree with the way U feel about religion. The atheists I've met R anything but reasonable, compassionate and empathetic. They R the 2nd most viscious group of ppl N the world today. Religion is very important & has great benefits 2 many.

This is ridiculous ...
By: kennebacasiskyle. on 12 Dec 08, 17:08:30
This is ridiculous nonsense. Atheists just want people to leave each other alone, instead of wanting to control each others' minds and bodies. Religion has been important to keep morons from killing each other of the same religion by inviting the fear of Hell (or the lack of "eternity"). Otherwise, religion has no benefits, and has only allowed a twisted, corrupt monster to grow where a beautiful society based on reason, compassion, and empathy should have done.

Sam Harris is so ...
By: naturallyselected69. on 11 Dec 08, 23:21:05
Sam Harris is so reasonable that the only counterarguments are emotional. ( Of course emotions can be wonderful, but in most cases they are generally indicative of failed arguments. :)

Your moral code is ...
By: silvercade. on 10 Dec 08, 08:30:33
Your moral code is stupid. Fornication is natural, so is fighting when necessary. Greed isn't that bad either, as long as you've earned your keep. Stem cell research is totally harmless OBVIOUSLY. Religion, namely Christianity says all of these things are sins. Haha, get with reality.

How are we ...
By: Zdrazy. on 10 Dec 08, 01:26:14
How are we destroying the world? I'd be very interested in gaining an insight into this reasoning.

Oh, thats the most ...
By: FreedomLover4Ever. on 09 Dec 08, 16:22:00
Oh, thats the most ridiculous sentiment I have ever heard. I don't think God butts N2 our lives N that way. Spontaneous abortions of fetuses with genetic defects is nature, not God. However, if He did, it's His prerogative to take life away, just as He gives it. Giving humans the right to kill whomever they choose is definitely not a good thing. You can believe abortion isn't murder all you want, but to me, it is murdering those who R 2 weak 2 have a say-so. What about the baby's rights 2 life?

25% of all ...
By: Grak70. on 09 Dec 08, 04:43:37
25% of all pregnancies end in spontaneous abortion by week 6. Of all pregnancies, 8% result in clinical miscarriage. 95% of all fetuses with genetic defects are spontaneously aborted. So in fact, yes, your god is the biggest abortionist of all. Good thing he doesn't exist...

You're behind on ...
By: FreedomLover4Ever. on 07 Dec 08, 12:42:11
You're behind on the atheist propaganda, moron. Atheists used to say Christians were more or just as dangerous as Muslims until they found out that Muslims are actually supposed to kill atheists & do kill them in some Islamic countries. Of course it was 2 late, tho, by then atheists had already put the US in more danger by them. Atheists are the most dangerous monsters on earth & they are destroying the world.

MoralMaster 2.0 Morality Monitor
Posted by: TruthSurge

Video duration: 301 seconds
Global video hits: 20249

The standard in morality monitoring just got better. The MoralMaster 2.0 can gauge your morality with a few quick questions. Don't wait! Call now and get your own MoralMaster 2.0 morality monitor! It could save you an eternity of regret!

Related: christianity, comedy, god, morals, religion, truthsurge

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

thanks.
By: TruthSurge. on 08 Jan 09, 04:47:18
thanks.

hehe
By: TruthSurge. on 08 Jan 09, 04:47:09
hehe

Indoor barbecue ...
By: TheStig000. on 08 Jan 09, 03:16:35
Indoor barbecue party that never ends rofl

This is great
By: TheFluffyDuck. on 06 Jan 09, 09:33:58
This is great

You're on our ...
By: TruthSurge. on 05 Jan 09, 00:44:44
You're on our mailing list! :) We'll be sure to bombard you with useless newsletters and such.

Sign me up!
By: AtheistGlitch. on 05 Jan 09, 00:40:05
Sign me up!

I've heard all the ...
By: TruthSurge. on 03 Jan 09, 22:54:56
I've heard all the explanations multiple times. How could it benefit me? If you HAVEN'T heard my side, then now you have. :) Ask yourself why an all-knowing deity would create a set of writings that weren't easily understandable to all. Better yet, why not just tell us directly and avoid the middle-man? Anyway, take it easy.

It is sad that one ...
By: sotuman. on 03 Jan 09, 22:14:47
It is sad that one who says he has "pondered" for so many years the meaning of a passage does not yet understand it. You do not understand because you do not want to. My advice to you is to burn every bible you can.

Know also that I am ...
By: sotuman. on 03 Jan 09, 22:10:54
Know also that I am not deluded half so much as you are. (It is far more accurate to say that we both are strongly persuaded as to what truth is.) God only tells us what we need to know. If the meaning is not clear enough for you then you are not making an honest effort at understanding it.

Well, if this ...
By: sotuman. on 03 Jan 09, 22:03:04
Well, if this discussion has been of little benefit to you, be happy that it has benefited my understanding of atheists greatly. Also, do not be confused about the meaning of apologetics. I am not apologizing as if there is any wrong on my part, but I am defending Christianity and the Bible. The two words come from the same root, but any mistake of meaning can only be taken as a joke.

Okay. I'm done for ...
By: TruthSurge. on 03 Jan 09, 21:46:00
Okay. I'm done for now. I've said all I want to say. I've listened to all of your points and replied. I doubt many atheists would have done this but again, you have presented no new explanation for why god killed babies during the punishment of others. I hope you can get out from under the strong delusion that allows you to apologize for an all-knowing god who can't even get his stories clear. Adios! Happy new year.

LOL! Before I read ...
By: TruthSurge. on 03 Jan 09, 21:43:13
LOL! Before I read this I knew you'd pull this one. Hey, and I suppose god spirited away those babies and children just before the flood happened BUT he didn't see fit to allow the writers of the stories to record that little bit of evidence. Nor did he want it recorded in the Sodom story. But since we know god commanded nursing babies explicitly on several other occasions to be slaughtered, why should we think he did otherwise here?

There was no " ...
By: sotuman. on 03 Jan 09, 21:10:33
There was no "burning alive for 15 minutes." If I understand anything about my God, it is that he is merciful, even in judgment. Everything would have died in the first three seconds. I too spit on any god that should be spit upon, and I spit on any suggestion that my God is included in the category you have put him in.

But consider this. ...
By: sotuman. on 03 Jan 09, 21:06:45
But consider this. If there was a God who was capable of raining down fire and brimstone on two cities in the first place, reducing them to a pile of ashes, would He not also be able to be discerning in his judgment? Could he not have instantly spirited any babies away? You confine a God you do not even believe exists by the weak limits of your own mind.

It is simply not ...
By: sotuman. on 03 Jan 09, 21:04:01
It is simply not possible for us all to go ahead and be in heaven. Heaven is far more real than this reality and we simply would not be able to handle it in our sinful state. Babies, in their state of innocence, are able. God was not judging any innocent babies, but the people who were trying to rape his angels.

But isn't it better ...
By: TruthSurge. on 03 Jan 09, 20:32:14
But isn't it better then for every one of us now to go ahead and be in heaven? Surely heaven is better than ANY position here on earth? And yet... what we find is that at any given time, 50% of us are dying and 50% being born (yet, it's more like 30%/70% due to the speed at which the population is MULTIPLYING). But worse, what kind of god would allow a baby to be born then a week later burn it alive for 15 minutes just so it could "go to a better place"? I spit on a god like that.

You haven't ...
By: TruthSurge. on 03 Jan 09, 20:28:04
You haven't explained THIS one yet. You know in your HEART that a city big enough for a king (yes, go read about Sodom and Gomorrah and you'll find this out) would have a normal distribution of people (roughtly 50/50 male/female with young, old, nursing babies, LOTS of babies, AND in this case many homosexuals). My friend... I need to move on but please, do a video. Research the issues fully and then when you are confident you have it, do it. :)

Even if ONE baby ...
By: TruthSurge. on 03 Jan 09, 20:25:49
Even if ONE baby existed in either town, god is a baby murderer. And ask yourself if an entire town could have been composed of 100% homosexuals. It couldn't. In one generation it would die off. A week old baby cannot do anything against an all-powerful deity. Admit to yourself that these are stories by hateful, ignorant bronze-age men of the desert. A word of an all-knowing god would be clear and error-free.

Of course I can't ...
By: sotuman. on 03 Jan 09, 10:38:49
Of course I can't explain away any of the other incidents where babies died as a casualty of other people's sins using the homosexual card, but I can probably rationalize all sorts of other things to counter your assertion that my God is immoral.

When I said that ...
By: sotuman. on 03 Jan 09, 10:28:36
When I said that the babies were irrelevant, I meant it was irrelevant to the exegesis of the text. It is however apparently very relevant in a discussion of whether or not God exists, since nobody wants to believe in a baby-murdering God. I wonder that there were any babies at all in Sodom and Gomorrah, since there were so many homosexuals, I doubt there was much sexual reproduction going on.

The matter of the ...
By: sotuman. on 03 Jan 09, 10:18:16
The matter of the babies is irrelevant. But suppose the two cities had lots of babies, innocent, little, helpless, nursing babies popping out around every corner. So God rains down fire and brimstone on all these babies, and they die for the sins of their parents. Their spirits return to God who gave them and they are free from all the problems of the world. They are now in heaven, far better off then they would have been in a city of agressive homosexuals bent on raping every visitor.

So, you actually ...
By: TruthSurge. on 03 Jan 09, 08:15:08
So, you actually believe that two cities had NO babies in it? Show me ANY city or town that has no babies and then I will concede the Sodom and Gomorrah account. Otherwise, you are only deceiving yourself. You are throwing away your knowledge in order to apologize for god's immorality. tsk tsk. THINK! It won't hurt you!!! :) But it may destroy your beliefs in religion, god, jesus, etc.

You say you know ...
By: sotuman. on 03 Jan 09, 03:42:46
You say you know the text of Genesis 19. You do realize that you are in fact putting something there which is not there? There is no mention of "newborn, week-old, nursing, innocent babies." I can read - I know what is there and what isn't. I can see that you do not want to believe in an evil god, but would you believe in a good God, if there was such a thing?

sigh... this is ...
By: TruthSurge. on 03 Jan 09, 02:55:26
sigh... this is growing tiresome. If you don't believe that burning a week-old baby because it's parent offended an all-powerful deity, we need to part ways now.

It does not take ...
By: sotuman. on 03 Jan 09, 02:20:04
It does not take decades of pondering for one to see that nowhere in the Bible is it ever indicated that God acts unjustly, although there are ample instances where man acts less than admirably and is therefore judged by God. Furthermore, I am exceedingly puzzled as to why you have all these ideas about a god which does not exist to begin with, according to you.

Religion & Morality (Oops!)
Posted by: freedom0f5peech

Video duration: 126 seconds
Global video hits: 17670

I thought religion created good morals? LOL!

Related: atheism, atheist, bible, dawkins, drugs, god, jesus, morality, morals, murder, rape, religion, religious, richard, study

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

no you dont ...
By: AntiVenomFangX. on 07 Jan 09, 05:22:56
no you dont understand theory, gravity is a theory... theories are hypothesis's that have been backed by scientific laws(usually discovered in the name of the theory) like evolution is a theory that is supported by laws. someone has been teaching you really immoral science.

Yes i know theory ...
By: marshallfan892. on 07 Jan 09, 03:03:03
Yes i know theory very well. If we don't work to prove theories... for or against... we wouldn't have laws. These laws are simply the basis of knowledge, which we use to prove theories. Until these theories are proven at least to a reasonable doubt, arguements shall go for and against them. I've seen more facts supporting atomic theory, there is a law of gravity(Newton would be ashamed hahaha), heliocentrism has overwhelming facts for it so my research is poor there but i agree. (all were dr's.

Yea it is a theory. ...
By: AntiVenomFangX. on 07 Jan 09, 00:36:38
Yea it is a theory... do you not know what a scientific theory is? atoms are theory, gravity is theory, heliocentrism(the earth revolves around the sun) is a theory... your mixing up theory with hypothesis. and can you please please please tell me which scientists debate against evolution? and are they biologists or are they unqualified to give a professional opinion? the fact that you don't believe in evolution and quote Ben Stein shows me that your far too gone and i cant help you.

hahaha straight to ...
By: marshallfan892. on 07 Jan 09, 00:11:21
hahaha straight to the point aren't we? well, acclimation is something i believe in, the adaptation of one to its surrounding is something i believe in. While evolution is still a theory, one with great supporting evidence and, don't get me wrong, even more against. There are still quite a few holes and in depth glances at biology go for and against. as far as scientific debates go, scientists against evolution win 90% of the time. So i don't really believe, but it is a beautiful theory.

do you believe in ...
By: AntiVenomFangX. on 06 Jan 09, 23:59:33
do you believe in evolution?

historical, ...
By: marshallfan892. on 06 Jan 09, 23:48:07
historical, philosophical. thomas jefferson scared...

science is agnostic ...
By: AntiVenomFangX. on 06 Jan 09, 23:40:25
science is agnostic... what atheist studies are you speaking of? deathbed confessions show people scared... plain and simple.

deathbed ...
By: marshallfan892. on 06 Jan 09, 23:09:32
deathbed confessions show something... atheists and their half-way studies.

It's not a ...
By: artgoat. on 05 Jan 09, 17:59:38
It's not a surprising result to me at all. Look at the poorest most backward, poverty and crime-ridden states in the USA: They're the most religious!

It's well known ...
By: 0lord0kinbote0. on 05 Jan 09, 16:15:30
It's well known among people with actual ethics that religion subverts compassion for loyalism and authority worship. The faithful of abrahamic religion tend to have the ethical development of a four year old. It's no accident. Ethical people make poor servants. Orders to cause pain and suffering (prop8 in california for example) would be rejected as would those who give them.

religion=PWNED
By: scott5878. on 05 Jan 09, 07:10:20
religion=PWNED

Praise Greg Paul!! ...
By: SlashIStheShit. on 05 Jan 09, 05:46:55
Praise Greg Paul!! lol

Excellent video! ...
By: antidote2010. on 04 Jan 09, 08:17:02
Excellent video! I've known all along that religious people are the most hypocritical bunch of liars, thieves and murderers.

This is great.
By: KajiCarson. on 04 Jan 09, 00:05:02
This is great.

Wow, this is ...
By: Hotora86. on 03 Jan 09, 21:34:22
Wow, this is hilarious! Religious bigots getting knocked off their "morality" high-horse. Finally. Thank God (haha) someone finally collected the data and had the balls to publish it. Oh, and if the book is coming out soon - I'll buy it!

One interesting ...
By: winterstellar. on 03 Jan 09, 14:14:40
One interesting fact: In America some 10 percent of the population are atheists, while in american prisons there are only 0.2 percent atheists.. In America the atheists tend to be educated people with okay jobs, and that's not the kind of people who usually do crimes and go to jail. There's a lot of hallelujah-shouting and praying going on in american prisons, though..haha. :)

I'm proposing the ...
By: AntiVenomFangX. on 03 Jan 09, 11:32:22
I'm proposing the Thomas Jefferson bible be the atheists bible. who else but someone who smacked the Christians down with things lie freedom of speech, and separation of church and state thus creating the best country so far on earth. The Thomas Jefferson bible is like 110 pages long and the font is huge... its proof that there are little morals actually in the bible.

Yup, and I wish ...
By: LogicalSanity. on 03 Jan 09, 10:46:37
Yup, and I wish more Christians read their bibles to see its immorality

The bible is immoral
By: TheBibleIsImmoral. on 02 Jan 09, 20:29:39
The bible is immoral

So? You're an old ...
By: EdwardHowton. on 02 Jan 09, 11:17:07
So? You're an old earth creationist instead of a young earth creationist. Or do you think magical space pixies are responsible for what actually looks like evolution? Either way, if you don't accept evolution, you're only making shit up, just like actual creationists, so you're not exactly much better off. Offer stands if you actually want to learn, but that would take -effort-, wouldn't it? Can't have that when the bible's all written out already, contradictions and all.

Funny how you go ...
By: EdwardHowton. on 02 Jan 09, 11:12:39
Funny how you go from the high ground to abject hypocrisy -again- in two sentences, and keep going for the next two. You're not wrong because you're stupid, you are wrong, and you are wilfully ignorant, which makes you stupid. Plus, haven't I just explained what I stand for? I stand for Reason, I promote education and learning, I fight against ignorance and superstition because of it. How about you apply your own advice and stop hiding behind the bible?

Hahaha you've went ...
By: pricer5. on 02 Jan 09, 11:10:04
Hahaha you've went as low as to personal insults. Real mature, I thought you were smarter than that. Were you wearing your mask that time!? I really think you should find something to stand for in stead of basing your life on standing against something. I'm out, peace.

I can tell. It's ...
By: EdwardHowton. on 02 Jan 09, 11:03:44
I can tell. It's such a waste of time to, you know, learn about things, get an education, and stop being ignorant. You're so right, I'm definitely convinced that being smart and not living in a deluded world of superstition is a waste of time. Some of us, like you, prefer to do what's easy. I actually care enough to live in reality. I meant it, never have kids. They deserve better than you.

Unlike you I am not ...
By: pricer5. on 02 Jan 09, 11:01:04
Unlike you I am not trying to impress anyone, "the first creationist I educate". Leave your ego at the door man. And once again you are assuming I am a creationist since I don't believe evolution to be fact. I actually do believe the earth is billions of years old, thought I'd throw that in there. And same arguement can go for you, "keep believing your lies and don't accept facts". It goes both ways. So go ahead and keep hiding behind your little mask for all I care.

If you really, ...
By: EdwardHowton. on 02 Jan 09, 10:55:02
If you really, honestly are interested in hearing how the actual scientific method works, toss me a PM. You won't be the first creationist I educate, but that one was actually honest when he said he wanted to learn. Don't think your "magnanimous" offer to agree to disagree impresses anyone, though. It's a stupid idea to do it. You're convinced that your lies are true and won't accept facts, I'm not going to justify your BS by agreeing to it. But go ahead and masturbate to Jesus for all I care.

Tyler Cowen: The Free Market and Morality
Posted by: bigthink

Video duration: 363 seconds
Global video hits: 3536

The George Mason economist answers the Big Question, "Does the free market corrode moral character?"
For more videos from this series please go to:
http://new.bigthi nk.com/topics/temple ton-big-question
http://www.temple ton.org/market

Related: big, cowen, foundation, templeton, think, tyler

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

Huh. I still ...
By: iabscond. on 07 Jan 09, 22:26:26
Huh. I still disagree. maybe I don't know anything. have you read any of tyler's blog? (koodos to stoobe80). to put it simply I think we may have varying definitions of the term poverty. From what I know "wellbeing" in both Mexico and the US have been steadily on the rise for a long time. I do agree with you though. NAFTA is a lousy rep for free trade, (more like free fade, oh!). I would still say the benefits outweigh the costs though, we'll have to agree to disagree on that one.

No it's not obvious ...
By: Renegen1. on 07 Jan 09, 22:06:08
No it's not obvious. Poverty in the US and Mexico have been on the rise ever since NAFTA, a suppositely "free trade" "globalist" agreement. Mexican farmers are driven out of work by subsidized american corn and they then immigrate illegally in the US or work for lower and lower wages in mexican factories. Christmas toys too in China are made by child workers, one of many examples. You have no idea what you're talking about of globalization, you have 0 facts, only propaganda.

If capital ...
By: TimLoganKnows911633. on 29 Dec 08, 03:02:03
If capital movements are free, tax on currencies are free, there's what economists call a VIRTUAL PARLIAMENT of investors & lenders who actually vote every minute, in fact. If they don't like what the government is doing, they ATTACK the currency. Hence, economic liberalisation is a usurpation of democracy by imposing a private TYRANNY of investors on the populace. "Free-market" policies are really imposing Social Darwinism on the people.

You are comparing a ...
By: TimLoganKnows911633. on 20 Dec 08, 21:30:02
You are comparing a theoretical critique of an already existing system (so called "free-market" policy as it presently exists) with a totalitarian regime of North Korea as a falsely assumed alternative. The comparison is false as it arises from your assumption of the fallacy of the false dilemma. There is indeed a wide spectrum of alternatives to existing "free market" policy. Europe, notably, sometimes exemplifies that. So does Australia.

We should protect ...
By: nowra100. on 20 Dec 08, 20:47:29
We should protect democracy by getting rid of the free market? Worked like a charm in North Korea.

I reject the ...
By: CosmicFork. on 12 Dec 08, 04:30:28
I reject the premise that we have a free market in this country for ordinary working people. What we have is a COERCIVE market. In a coercive market, the earning power of labor and the standard of living of workers declines, and society as a whole is devastated while those with economic power gain an ever more unbalanced share of the nation's wealth. Those who preach the virtues of the free market should be the first to recognize that a coercive market is as destructive as a free market is good.

where did you pull ...
By: shankyxyz. on 12 Dec 08, 01:46:54
where did you pull out that statistic. any sources.

Self-servitude is ...
By: DownWithBrzezinski. on 06 Dec 08, 23:04:24
Self-servitude is not necessarily "selfishness". Statistically, armed societies have have LESS problems with violence. Psychotics go on rampages in *unarmed* areas because they know they won't meet any resistance. Good video, though.

I think there's ...
By: deepdivestudios. on 03 Dec 08, 07:05:38
I think there's something to the old "power corrupts" adage. Give power to the govt to fix and regulate, and govt corruption and inefficiency will rise. Remove regulations and give power to the free market, and that's where you'll find rising greed and corruption. Swings like a pendulum to hopefully balance out. Maybe people need to pay a little more attention so it doesn't have to swing so far.

If capital ...
By: TimLoganKnows911633. on 02 Dec 08, 23:26:25
If capital movements are free, tax on currencies are free, there's what economists call a VIRTUAL PARLIAMENT of investors & lenders who actually vote every minute, in fact. If they don't like what the government is doing, they ATTACK the currency. Hence, economic liberalisation is a usurpation of democracy by imposing a private TYRANNY of investors on the populace. "Free-market" policies are really imposing Social Darwinism on the people.

too much theorie ...
By: jonz23m. on 01 Dec 08, 19:56:56
too much theorie not enough reality in his views.

Wait, Tyler's still ...
By: iabscond. on 25 Nov 08, 14:47:12
Wait, Tyler's still right.Can you name me a time when the world was better off by impeding globalization?Tyler say nothing about how int markets have been exploited.Dont you think there would be less of that if markets there were more int. Nike doesnt use child labor anymore because we know they did, because we have a media that also globalized.Isnt it obvious that the net costs of globalization dont outweigh the net benefits?

He's got a great ...
By: stoobe80. on 25 Nov 08, 14:19:07
He's got a great blog called "marginal revolution". Check it out if you enjoyed the talk.

But there IS a sort ...
By: stotelheim. on 25 Nov 08, 13:40:14
But there IS a sort of biological narrative going on, where life has evolved from simplicity towards complexity. While individual species may just be pixels in a larger pattern, the lifeforms that replace them will carry on their narrative. I kinda thinks this makes extinction of individual species a non-catastrophic event as long as the narrative of life moves towards greater complexity and diversity.

All species have ...
By: jglassman. on 25 Nov 08, 13:01:25
All species have only one outcome in the end: extinction.

The human species ...
By: antiparticlesteve. on 19 Nov 08, 05:58:26
The human species is a joke, all we care about is our own self interest which in turn leeds us to live in the lake of illusions, with our greed and creation of waste. We have only one outcome in the end. EXTINCTION

i really like this ...
By: creten69. on 19 Nov 08, 04:44:19
i really like this guy,i am such a jerk off,at least everyone knows when i speak,im retwarded.Global is good and all the poor people are like i dont want to get chipped.But if you travel around and around youll see all the poor people scurrying about just like rich people in traffic.Even the guys in the congo who work under a gun so we can have computers and they work for air,but still air is good,all people should get free air in our free market...So can we do something or just giggle?

Pretty sound stuff, ...
By: stone1home. on 18 Nov 08, 18:44:03
Pretty sound stuff, but 0n greed and corruption, and their role in the current financial mess, I completely disagree with him. As for Bush, Paulson and the bailout debacle, I completely agree with him. He's wrong on globalization, and pays little attention to the details of how various markets have been criminally exploited, mismanaged; and many destroyed outright.

The Morality Squad
Posted by: King7045

Video duration: 308 seconds
Global video hits: 17494

Song from the movie "Phallus in Wonderland" good song ^_^

Related: balsac, beefcake, dance, death, gorgor, gwar, hymen, morality, oderus, phallus, sexicutioner, slymenstra, squad

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

Power Rangers on ...
By: 3kinjite. on 05 Dec 08, 13:28:57
Power Rangers on LSD??? "No, Wrong!! CRACK!!" LOL!!

Hey I just emailed ...
By: snowblindu. on 14 Nov 08, 15:12:25
Hey I just emailed Harmonix told them they should put this song in Rock Band... then I played the song again and realized that was in the lyrics hahha how great would it be to be playing the game with an unsuspecting guest on vocals and that comes up on the screen WOO

Tjos spmg os tje ...
By: snowblindu. on 14 Nov 08, 15:10:33
Tjos spmg os tje ficlomg sjot!!!

WTF?? Is there ...
By: cantbefaded. on 06 Oct 08, 04:35:48
WTF?? Is there more than one version of Phallus in Wonderland because I have the VHS and this video is different.....same kind of shit but its off. Anyone know anything about this?

The funniest and ...
By: Mephistonia. on 14 Sep 08, 15:52:11
The funniest and most creative band ever! btw,if your penis talks to you, seek help.

NECRO BESTIAL ANAL ...
By: riptorn311. on 08 Sep 08, 03:58:53
NECRO BESTIAL ANAL BUTT SEX!!!!! WOO HOO!!!! fuck yeah

lol 'oh yea ...
By: Cewlsack. on 08 Aug 08, 00:43:07
lol 'oh yea fuuuuuuuuuuck you' lol funny

The cuttlefish is ...
By: BunnaySango. on 31 Jul 08, 22:30:43
The cuttlefish is adorable.

Ahhh GWAR you can ...
By: luismartinez910. on 15 Jul 08, 06:22:35
Ahhh GWAR you can never stop making us laugh.

...
By: davensonya. on 11 Jul 08, 04:21:40
necrobeastialanalbuttsex - best word ever.

Power Rangers on ...
By: Fanon99. on 05 Jun 08, 23:41:18
Power Rangers on LSD.

god damn this song ...
By: Hellview12a. on 28 May 08, 19:56:40
god damn this song makes just wanna go crazy, but in a good way lol.

WHAT THE FUCKMOTHER?
By: heyeveryoneimcool. on 05 May 08, 09:39:54
WHAT THE FUCKMOTHER?

THE (!) most ...
By: MrGreenride. on 13 Apr 08, 16:50:59
THE (!) most underrated band on the planet! check the album THIS TOILET EARTH! song 1- 16 (there ARE "only" 16!) are TOP!!!

omg!!wen they ...
By: wain41. on 29 Mar 08, 00:04:38
omg!!wen they ripped them apart i jus wanted to mosh like crazi!!!

Damn skippy man... ...
By: stfunoobomghax. on 12 Mar 08, 09:15:58
Damn skippy man... Damn skippy...

You can NEVER have ...
By: Grunt213. on 12 Mar 08, 03:45:26
You can NEVER have enough midgets.

This video needs ...
By: stfunoobomghax. on 20 Feb 08, 11:27:19
This video needs more fucking midgets!!!!

I just love Gwar's ...
By: MetalAcid5. on 20 Feb 08, 00:09:34
I just love Gwar's awesome ways to insult. "Oh yeah? Well FUCK you!"

whos the guy with ...
By: Blade666324. on 11 Feb 08, 15:44:57
whos the guy with those weird crutches?

LOL Sleazy's face ...
By: notelvisjr. on 09 Feb 08, 04:09:23
LOL Sleazy's face at 4:22

So classic, Thanks ...
By: Grunt213. on 31 Jan 08, 05:02:32
So classic, Thanks for the memories.

sleazy p should ...
By: toecuttergpx. on 30 Dec 07, 11:24:41
sleazy p should have his own tv show

Haha not to mention ...
By: Kayly101. on 13 Dec 07, 23:24:14
Haha not to mention Gwar would pull off their masks and show everyone lordi is just humans playing pop rock hee hee!

unless you want the ...
By: bookofthoth. on 12 Oct 07, 02:56:36
unless you want the band to have money for great live shows and better albums.....greedy dipshit

The Morality of God (part 1/2)
Posted by: silverstream314

Video duration: 542 seconds
Global video hits: 787

Credit:
The Atheist Experience
#578
http://www.atheis t-experience.com
Be sure not to miss Matt's brilliant rant at the end of part 2.

Related: atheism, atheist, baker, dillahunty, don, existance, experience, god, heaven, hell, matt, morality, religion

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Sin, Morality and Change...
Posted by: TheoreticalBullshit

Video duration: 411 seconds
Global video hits: 2972

Not an argument, but nonetheless something that really should be addressed.
By the way... Somebody accidentally kicked me in the face. What, you think I'm the kind of guy who gets into fights?

Related: atheism, atheist, bible, christ, christian, christianity, creation, dawkins, debate, ethics, evil, god, jesus, morality, religion, rrs

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

Very nice points.
By: BoOyaH1388. on 07 Jan 09, 17:52:50
Very nice points.

atheism is not a ...
By: jrev37. on 25 Dec 08, 20:33:12
atheism is not a choice, it is a conclusion. you do not convert to it neither do you accept it. observation of the natural world is a key to it for different issues such as understanding behavior and morality and to determine what is REAL and what is not. Morality IS subjective, dependent to one's perception of reality. the problem is most theist mix this subjectivness with either anarchy or just simply doing what ever the hell you want,and off course nothing can be as wrong as this idea.

well yea but whats ...
By: SousukePanic. on 04 Dec 08, 06:40:53
well yea but whats stupid is when people try to prove their argument for religion without saying i feel god, and when they try to talk about logic and proof for their connection with god, im all for those people that believe in god since if it provides them with more happier lives then before its all good in my opinion but not everybody feels that and still try to convince people to connect with god thats when atheism disproves their arguments

I agree;and also ...
By: jeruke. on 03 Dec 08, 04:07:25
I agree;and also anything that operates outside of reality can never be dis proven, or proven. which reveals it's absurdity.Faith requires no proof!

an atheist doesnt ...
By: SousukePanic. on 02 Dec 08, 13:17:46
an atheist doesnt have to disprove god but we're interested in knowing the logical decisions behind religous people's actions to further verify our standpoint and its interesting to think about ?

atheism is not a ...
By: jeruke. on 01 Dec 08, 15:06:05
atheism is not a choice. and also atheism does not have to be defended. it is not up to an atheist to disprove the existence of God. write a response to ask me why and I will tell you.

morals and Gods law ...
By: animeisart1. on 25 Nov 08, 04:16:24
morals and Gods law are different. you could be doing something that is "moral" to a certain society but a sin against God. for instance. it is immoral to admit you are Christian in certain Muslim societies. meaning its moral to say you are not if asked. but according to the bible God say you are supposed to never deny him. therefore, doing what is moral is still a sin

we have morals for ...
By: animeisart1. on 25 Nov 08, 03:35:55
we have morals for a simple reason. so we don't kill each other off. Theists believe God gave us these morals. Atheists believe we evolved them because they help our species advance. as a Christian i think both are correct.

Not to forget do ...
By: CognosSquare. on 27 Sep 08, 14:24:39
Not to forget do not pick up any sticks today on the sabbath -thats a stonin'. In the old testamen sabbath was on saturday. It was decided to be on sunday by the Church Council of Laodicea circa 364 AD. But its all objective you know.

You failed to ...
By: hugesinker. on 11 Sep 08, 01:52:41
You failed to address the notion of "only the punishment has changed." An apologist can easily say that God is the ultimate judge (as the bible says) and that it is not man's responsibility to punish sin. In this case, there are more than two categories. Instead of just sin and not-sin, there are also recommendations. For example, the bible says to help the poor. Does that mean you MUST help the poor until you have given away all your possessions otherwise you have sinned? Obviously not.

Read the whole ...
By: YDOAPS. on 17 Aug 08, 20:37:58
Read the whole passage. 5:17-20 should give you a better idea of what he was saying. Jesus said to follow the letter of the Law until the end of days-when ALL is fulfilled.

Ok, i've seen your ...
By: DeeEmarr. on 26 Jun 08, 06:19:08
Ok, i've seen your Answers videos, i know the whole story about the jetskiing and all that... but the description in this video... "accidentally kicked me in the face," was simply hilarious to me.

morality is subject ...
By: bello787878. on 19 Jun 08, 08:49:47
morality is subject to time and change ... thats just based on society's views at that time...

YDOAPS: thats a ...
By: lilwestkid. on 09 Jun 08, 06:45:51
YDOAPS: thats a scary thought. Better go kill some disobedient children.

Accidentally kicked ...
By: webuildfire. on 02 Jun 08, 04:28:50
Accidentally kicked in the face? How does that come about? And I'm non-religious so mind me not arguing with you for a moment and stating the fact you're startlingly attractive.

I am an atheist ...
By: acapulkena. on 22 Apr 08, 05:40:32
I am an atheist also,that cool and proud.don`t care about the bible at all the book is a total LIEEEEEEE!!!!

Here's some ...
By: YDOAPS. on 10 Apr 08, 00:17:13
Here's some biblical ground for you: Matthew 5:17-20 Jesus says morality HAS NOT CHANGED and we are to follow it to the letter of the Law until ALL is fulfilled at the end of days.

You're skewing his ...
By: andytoz. on 22 Mar 08, 11:33:58
You're skewing his point leia. If god once commanded that we stone people to death for doing X and we don't do that when someone does X, then we are disobeying god. This can be defined as sinful/immoral, right? Then jesus comes along and now we don't need to stone people to death. Therefore morality has changed. It's now moral to let them be judged by god and it is now immoral to stone people.

good video scott. ...
By: leiapeison. on 12 Mar 08, 05:23:34
good video scott. you are wrong on a few things though. the punishment for immorality hasn't changed. romans 6:23 in the new testament says that the wages of sin is death. the soul that sins will still die. the only differance now is that everyone saved or unsaved is under a grace period since jesus came. he is holding back his judgement on the world until the tribulation. the gospels even state that god makes the rain to fall on the righteous and the unrighteous. good luck

All this talk about ...
By: jordasher. on 23 Dec 07, 05:32:47
All this talk about God existing not existing, back and forth, arguments everywhere, interesting points and opinions just somehow makes me impression I'd be better off believing that God exists. I consider myself very open minded still I am unconvinced. Deluded I think not, don't you have to be stupid first. Personally I believe if you really want to spend your life questioning God's existence be prepared for infinite answers to your infinite questions.

Morals are almost ...
By: mace. on 14 Dec 07, 15:03:37
Morals are almost immutable if they are based on man's life as a standard of value and not God. Everyone would agree that murder is undesirable. Everyone prefers industry to larceny. And these things were prohibited before Moses in the precursor to the 10 Commandments - The Code of Hammurabi. Wherever man's rights and life are important these MUST be the standards of morality.

Of course it ...
By: Antichrist4Life. on 06 Dec 07, 05:23:02
Of course it changed, and at the whim of a pen on papyrus paper! Eye for an eye became "turn the other cheek." Stoning became "let he who has never sinned cast the first stone." Divorce suddenly became adultery. Capital punishment for working on the Sabbath was abolished with censure. Food rites became "it is not what goes into a man that makes him unclean, but what comes out of him." And it all changed by word of Christ BEFORE he was crucified, meaning BEFORE the grace dispensation!

Then how do you ...
By: top2d2. on 05 Dec 07, 16:45:17
Then how do you know that you're not really reaching out to spirit of God, but the spirit of Satin? If it says in the book that he's all mighty etc, well what if the Bible is the Devil's method of manipulating his victims, masking as God?

Its the medium they ...
By: Chiszle. on 29 Oct 07, 22:15:33
Its the medium they have been granted to use. If there really isnt a god then why can a person obtain a contact with a spirit of the beyond. There are demons, Which u will feel when its to late.. u shouldnt reach out to those. Who u should reach out for is God, u can feel him like the sun at a certain point. Ppl who have bene 'possesed' by evil spirits know the contrast between the good and evil and thats why most of them convert

I mean no offense ...
By: DocKro23. on 28 Oct 07, 08:41:21
I mean no offense to Christians or any other folks who believe in what the Holy Bible has to say...however, how can anyone put faith in a book, like the Holy Bible? I'm pretty much agnostic, and I'm not saying that God and/or Jesus do/don't exist, but really, the Bible is nothing more than a very old book of fairy tales.

Objective Morality: No God Required (Part 2)
Posted by: tooltime9901

Video duration: 449 seconds
Global video hits: 853

The idea that an objective moral system cannot exist without God is total bull shit. I am currently too lazy to write a full description

Related: atheism, bible, god, humanity, morals, philosophy, religion, theism

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

Hold on a sec, ...
By: ThisIsRysta. on 29 Dec 08, 14:11:12
Hold on a sec, haven't you been addressing SUBJECTIVE morality in this argument? You are really smart in isolating that a God based morality is a matter of self-interst, but this is still subjective morality. Your video hasn't really explained how there can be an objective or fundamental moral system without God.

Interesting. By the ...
By: Chuloloc. on 09 Dec 08, 02:25:12
Interesting. By the way, there's one thing you left out and that is that in order for there to be morality, there also needs to be a sense of reason. For example, there should be rules that forbid things like murder and theif but at the same time, rules that dictate mental and emotional negativity, what people do on Sunday or devotion and affection to some deity do not belong in the equation. It's about common sense and reasoning over religious stupidity. Great video.

oh, and god's ...
By: saadaya. on 30 Nov 08, 01:06:58
oh, and god's morality is NOT objective! Read Exodus 32:26-29, or 1 Samuel 15:3, or Deuteronomy 21-22 ... the same god that said 'thou shalt not kill', elsewhere said 'kill kill kill!'. There are also instructions to commit genocide of gay people in leviticus 18, and the genocide and extermination of 31 entire cities comprising several nations was detailed and glorified in Joshua 12.

The fact that ...
By: saadaya. on 30 Nov 08, 01:03:26
The fact that ethics exists without monotheism or God is evident in two things: BUDDHISM, a non-theistic or agnostic religion, is the least violent, most ethically sophisticated religion on Earth, the one that produces the least amount of iniquity. and second, the ANCIENT PHILOSOPHERS of Greece, who were either polytheistic or agnostic, were the inventors of the philosophical discipline we know as ETHICS.

Well done! You ...
By: 4G3NTanon. on 29 Oct 08, 10:46:48
Well done! You covered it better than Hitchens did debating Al Sharpten.

Wow... really good ...
By: fenoglios. on 27 Oct 08, 22:12:24
Wow... really good video. And I definitely resonate with the idea that the typical moral argument is off topic (and epistemologically pragmatic). I'd like for you to check out a video I made called 'moral argument for the truth of Christianity.' I argue that morality is essentially teleological. Let me know what you think.

Too bad most ...
By: limegreensquid. on 20 Oct 08, 16:54:38
Too bad most theists will just say the devil put those words in your mouth to confuse and test them. I mean, i could understand children thinking that - but grown adults believe in that shit, too. Thanks for a very eye-opening look at objective morality without the need of a deity of any sort.

Objectivity is no ...
By: Amadeojd. on 17 Oct 08, 07:05:57
Objectivity is no synonym for invariability. The best synonym might be impartiality - when you claim to be objective, you are evaluating the situation without being of any of the different clans. You therefore are objective when you consider each an every point of view as a object to study instead of a subjective opinion. Variation has nothing to do with it. Unless you claim objectivity is some universal truth - and if you do so, morality might just be subjective by definition!

by saying that ...
By: migkillertwo. on 17 Oct 08, 00:49:14
by saying that morals are just what people believe, then you cannot say that they are objective simply because they will vary from person to person.

Using a religious ...
By: Amadeojd. on 17 Oct 08, 00:46:55
Using a religious moral code as oneself objective morality is but the widening of one subjective vision to extend it to many people. If we can say it is objective because it's the same for everyone, then we can study with scientific method what kind of people bear what moral standards and doing that objectify subjectivity, just as well as the subjective divine Revelation would hold for the objective basis of christian morality.

'by saying that ...
By: Amadeojd. on 17 Oct 08, 00:42:34
'by saying that morality is simply what one believes you have shifted to moral subjectivism.' Yes, this is moral subjectivism. Now moral objectivism can be reached by (and may be only by) the observation of the tendencies of moral subjectivism among a population using scientific (i.e. objective) method.

"what one believes ...
By: migkillertwo. on 16 Oct 08, 20:06:18
"what one believes ought be done" amadeojd, you have completely abandoned the point which is the existence of objective morality without God, but Tooltime sets out to prove this in these 2 videos. by saying that morality is simply what one believes you have shifted to moral subjectivism.

Well, you only want ...
By: Amadeojd. on 16 Oct 08, 04:17:36
Well, you only want a proof... should not be too hard. Proposed definition of morality: what one beliefs ought to be done, using reason (from whatever premises, for example God). Premise 1: science is possible without God. 2: science is objective. 3: you can assert beliefs using scientific method. 4: you can assert the use of reason. Conclusion: you can get objective morality without God. Please mig tell me how I would be wrong (since I don't believe you'll let me have a point ;).

what? are you ...
By: tooltime9901. on 14 Oct 08, 21:01:23
what? are you saying that if humans did not exist then he would be just to them in theory if they did exist from the stand point of eternity? also, it would not be meaningless, what is good would be good not because god loves it, be because he arbitrarily structured reality so that certain things were good, while others were bad. i think that if you actually stop and contemplate what you deem to be right and wrong that you can easily see how it is reality dependent.

you seem to ...
By: migkillertwo. on 14 Oct 08, 20:54:49
you seem to misunderstand me. Since we would be creations of God, and since God is not a temporal entity, it logically follows that the concept of humanity existed "for eternity". but if you say that God is "Beyond all morals" then this euthyphro dilemma becomes utterly meaningless.

actually, it is a ...
By: tooltime9901. on 14 Oct 08, 20:46:21
actually, it is a logically invalid argument, because both of the premises can be true, and the conclusion false. the conclusion does not follow with necessity from the premises. god could simply be beyond all values, morals and meanings and select justice arbitrarily as a base principle. also, who or what would god be just or compassionate to if he was the only thing in existence? what or whom would he love, etc? these concepts imply a relationship between things.

if moral values are ...
By: migkillertwo. on 14 Oct 08, 20:30:45
if moral values are objective and revolve around justice and compassion, and if morals exist because of God's decree, then it logically follows that God must then be just. But the fact that the concept of humans or entities with sentience and needs seems to strongly contradict this idea that justice and compassion would be meaningless if God was the only thing which existed.

Hi, great set of ...
By: leorcc. on 14 Oct 08, 18:42:10
Hi, great set of videos. 2 questions: 1. Why is the concept of morals without a god so difficult to grasp? I am not having a go at christians but to me it seems so obvious that morality existed long before religion and still exist should religion fade out (which I doubt it will). 2: Peter, would you say that when something is wrong to do at one stage, is always wrong at whatever circumstance?

who exactly would ...
By: tooltime9901. on 14 Oct 08, 12:55:15
who exactly would god be fair or equal to exactly? and what if your epistemological grounds for claiming this? it seems that more often then not, theologians pull attributes of god out their ass.

My moral rule to ...
By: Censeo. on 14 Oct 08, 07:02:08
My moral rule to know what is wrong is. If someone must by definition dislike the action, then it is also wrong by definition.

What does it mean ...
By: darkforce333. on 14 Oct 08, 05:20:34
What does it mean to have an objective basis for morality? Morality implies what ought to be done. But why ought something be done. Does it objectively matter if we kill eachother or do we subjectevely find it better not to kill people? If God is the basis for morality, what does it mean to say we should or should not do this or that? Is it because God can gain or lose anything? Is it because we can gain or lose something? Perhaps the purpose of morality indicates the existence of morality.

My best friend ...
By: jjmd280. on 14 Oct 08, 04:25:10
My best friend pushed me out of the way of a car when I was 16. He was hit and is now in a vegetative state. Is that good enough? It was for me.

This instance has ...
By: GrundVorAllemJetzt. on 14 Oct 08, 04:18:56
This instance has been noted as a true act of altruism by any definition since the chimpanzee was not of relation to the researcher (not in the last 1000 years at least) and this act was a cost to itself with no benefit.

a young male from ...
By: GrundVorAllemJetzt. on 14 Oct 08, 04:18:18
a young male from the group collected some fruits from a tree and climbed down toward the researcher. The chimpanzee then proceeded to approach the researcher and leave the fruit for the researcher. I'm still looking for a human example, but it does exist.

The said example ...
By: GrundVorAllemJetzt. on 14 Oct 08, 04:17:29
The said example concerns a chimpanzee and a human. A researcher was following a group of chimpanzees in the jungle. After some hours, he found that he had forgotten his lunch back at the research station. This researcher then proceeded to try to knock down fruit from a tree some distance from where the group of chimpanzees sat eating their mid-day meal. It has been noted that after some time of unsuccessful attempts to acquire fruit...

A Darkness Rant: CNN GTA Morality Report Part 1
Posted by: Darknessthecurse

Video duration: 583 seconds
Global video hits: 12747

It's HEEEEEERE!!!
Oh, and I fixed the audio problem many of you mentioned.

Related: auto, cnn, darkness, game, games, grand, gta, gta4, jack, morality, rant, report, rockstar, theft, thompson, video, violence

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

A Darkness Rant: CNN GTA Morality Report Part 2
Posted by: Darknessthecurse

Video duration: 614 seconds
Global video hits: 9260

???????? ????? - GREEK MORALITY PART-1
Posted by: Epicomahos

Video duration: 355 seconds
Global video hits: 215

Greek morality

Related: alexander, great, greece, greek, macedonia, morality, the

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Objective Morality?
Posted by: h8uall66

Video duration: 538 seconds
Global video hits: 379

If objective morality were real, shouldn't you be able to demonstrate it objectively?

Related: am, and, atheism, better, can, it, morality, objective, objectively, prove, than, theism, you

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Business-Management Videos

Watching: Morality video compilations